Legal News - Court Overturns Sentence in TV Show Scam

Legal News Journal

Legal News Home page Click here to add this website to your favorites
  rss
Bar News Search >>>
Court Overturns Sentence in TV Show Scam

•  Court News     updated  2008/03/14 13:23

A federal appeals court has overturned a 366-day prison term for a man who bilked investors out of millions of dollars by claiming to be producing a government-backed television show about the Department of Homeland Security, saying it fell far short of sentencing guidelines.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday set aside Joseph Medawar's sentence, which was a fraction of what prosecutors sought and even less than his own attorney requested.

A three-judge panel decided that U.S. District Judge Manuel Real "committed procedural error" in not using federal guidelines to determine Medawar's sentence and ordered that he be re-sentenced.

Guidelines called for 57 to 71 months in prison, and prosecutors had asked for 57.

The panel also said Real did not provide a "significant justification" for giving the sentence.

Medawar, 46, pleaded guilty in May 2006 to tax evasion and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, admitting fleecing about 50 people of millions of dollars. He could now face further prison time.

Prosecutors said Medawar's lies included telling investors that President Bush endorsed the series and that Homeland Security approved use of its name and seal for the TV show.

They said he claimed 26 episodes of "DHS" were in post-production and that the company had distribution deals with 137 overseas markets. Investigators found that only one episode had been shot, and only after Medawar became aware of the federal probe.

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles, which appealed Medawar's sentence, had no comment on the ruling.

Defense attorney Daniel Snider said: "We are very happy with the court's ruling. The 9th Circuit has done what was expected in sending the case back to Judge Real for further explanation of his reasoning."

Real, a federal judge since 1966, has received several rebukes from the appeals court, including a reprimand last year that said he had shown a "pattern and practice of not providing reasons for his decisions when required to do so."


Breaking Legal News  |  Headline News  |  Law Center  |  Legal Business  |  Court News  |  Law Firm News  |  Legal Interviews |  Political and Legal
Practice Focuses  |  Legal Spotlight  |  Events & Seminars  |  Legal Marketing  |  Court Watch  |  Immigration  |  Press Releases
International  |  Politics  |  Justice Stories  |  Web Design for Law Firms  |  Celebrity Courthouse
Lawyer Website Design For Sole Practitioners
© The Legal News Journal. All rights reserved.